In Reply to: Re: traph Pointed Out Down The Board That NoCar Was Whistled For 22 posted by SehornBlew on December 22, 2024 at 08:00:54
In that sense, my calculation of a tie at the end of regulation based on equilibrating the respective FT %ages was correct, when looking at the aggregate FT numbers (No Car a poor 24-35, UCLA an awful 13-22).
You can obviously diddle with the numerous combinations and permutations, but when you look at the actual #s, the difference was only 2 pts as my sole point was something that no one had pointed out ~~~ that No Car was also poor from the stripe........which mitigated the difference even given the big disparity in FTAs. Yet another reason to bemoan a UCLA L that shouldn't have been.