I've said it before: what's the difference between UCLA and other top teams? We have Lauren Betts and they don't. Never better illustrated than Q1 on the road vs a top 10 opponent.
UCLA 20 (Betts 14), Maryland 15.
Maryland is working the ball well to get some good looks but I doubt what they're doing is sustainable for the entire game.
UCLA (or "you silly" as per NBC cc) lead as always by Betts and Rice
Betts 14 pts, 3 RBs
Rioe 4 pts
Think we tango an entire game with only two players scoring? Looks like we could and could still bet successful at it.(but we won't)
FG % UCLA 63% (3 pt 0-2) UM 41% (3 pt 1-6 )
RBs UCLA 12-6
A/TO - UCLA 8/7, UM 2/6
Pts in the paint UCLA 18, UM 6
PFs nothing to mention either team