In Reply to: I don't read BRO much. I certainly don't pay. posted by Cachorro on February 21, 2025 at 10:57:00
I find BRO to be worth the $2.25/month that I pay (annual subscription with 75% discount) as a source of Ucla-only content...can't really find it anywhere else (LA Times? The Athletic?). But, as Barry says, Jonathan Lee has been an excellent addition...and I don't think his game reviews are behind the paywall.
Too many annoying ads/auto-start videos plus garbage content from the 247 network. Woods offers excellent analysis, imo. Pierson not so much these days, his commentaries are typically long-winded & circular. But he has developed great sources over the past 2+ decades and offers some solid insider tidbits at times.
With NIL & the transfer portal, recruiting coverage for both UCLA basketball & football is just empty content/clickbait/useless noise at this point.