In Reply to: Re: "demonstrably untrue"??? The premise, logic and conclusion posted by Deplorable on September 19, 2024 at 08:21:17
When the raid happened, ONE person posted about it and mentioned his son, who had played at Ucla was put in handcuffs. Technically the poster used the wrong term 'accused' instead of alleged about P Diddy since charges hadn't been filed yet. However in your follow up post, you also used the term accused so to most rational people, the only implication was there may be possible trouble for P Diddy. The important point here in that you are either STUPID or a LIAR, as NO ONE said anything or implied anything about GUILT.
And what made things more comedic is absolutely NO ONE responded to the original post except you a few days later, but in your little imaginary world, you somehow envisioned most if not all BZ posters claiming guilt.
TROLL On