In Reply to: Re: Ya, it's going to be a sh!t show posted by confused442 on January 18, 2025 at 11:18:53
Title 9 is always the issue. Under current guidance you’re correct, no doubt.
I’m trying to make the strongest case why title 9 doesn’t apply. If you have a completely separate entity that makes 90% of the athletic revenue for the university and it’s attributable to just the football program, the case for a 50/50 split based on gender alone looks all the more ridiculous.
Plus you have outside NIL. If a particular female athlete hits the national zeitgeist like Livvy or Clark or Reese, they are making lots of $$. The SC female hooper is making a lot of money.