In Reply to: Compare Ucla's AD to the new guy at Stanford... posted by ClockBlocker on August 01, 2025 at 15:44:14
They have a seasoned, successful CEO. We have a lightweight nothingburger. They have someone with marketing savvy and real world business connections. We have a vacuous, gibberish spewing gladhander. They have someone who's made strategic decisions under the glare of markets and impatient shareholders. We have a salary and pension sucking sanctimonious place keeper, safely ensconced in a protective, do-nothing bureaucracy.
No comparison at all. They have someone who looks capable of leading a successful business. We have a minor league report filer. It wouldn't surprise me to see Stanford re-do its NIL approach, revive its talent acquisitions and begin a strong recovery in football. Elite Ucla will continue to flounder at the bottom of the pond.