DOJ gave the interviews to Maxwell, but not us.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Open Forum ]

Posted by mh on February 21, 2026 at 15:22:39

In Reply to: The Trump rape allegation getting little notice* posted by mh on February 21, 2026 at 11:46:23

Roger Sollenberger, a former Daily Beast reporter, has been going where the MSM fear to tread. He’s found evidence that three interviews with a woman who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was 13-15 years old are still being hidden by the DOJ.

The DOJ removed a document from Epstein files database that referenced four interviews, but Sollenberger found a copy via the Wayback Machine. When he reported this on his Substack, the DOJ put the document back.

But they have not released the interviews, and there has been no explanation of why the document was removed and put back.

The record that disappeared — and is now back online — is an evidence catalog showing that those interviews were among the “non-witness material” that DOJ prosecutors produced for Maxwell’s defense team. In other words, this document is proof that Maxwell’s attorneys have those three interviews. It’s also proof that all four of those interviews — part of DOJ’s Maxwell trial evidence — should in fact have been released to the public in the Epstein files.

Why didn’t Trump’s DOJ release all of the victim’s FBI interviews? Why would the DOJ be fine with Maxwell’s attorneys holding these records while apparently denying them to the American public in defiance of the law? The DOJ should release those interviews to the public, an act that would, coincidentally, considerably weaken the hand that we now know Maxwell — perhaps uniquely — holds over the president.



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Email:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Open Forum ]