In Reply to: It wasn't debunked you stupid f*CK. She received threats posted by Bruinfan4ever on April 28, 2026 at 06:56:59
And you don't think he would threaten someone who was taking him to court for rape? Even Caroll was threatened
E. Jean Carroll testified that she received a staggering number of death threats, rape threats, and abusive messages following her allegations against Donald Trump, which began in 2019 and continued through her court appearances in 2023 and 2024
1. Statements about members of Congress (2025)
In late 2025, Donald Trump posted about a group of Democratic lawmakers who had criticized him and encouraged military personnel to refuse illegal orders.
He called their actions “seditious behavior”
وأضاف that such behavior is “punishable by death”
This prompted strong backlash:
Congressional leaders said the president was effectively calling for execution of elected officials
Some lawmakers asked police to investigate the posts as “threatening” or “intimidating”
Civil liberties groups like the American Civil Liberties Union described the remarks as “dangerous” threats against political opposition
👉 This is one of the most direct examples involving Congress specifically.
🧑🤝🧑 2. Rhetoric affecting U.S. citizens (protesters)
During 2020 protests after the killing of George Floyd:
Trump posted: “when the looting starts, the shooting starts.”
Critics argued:
It could be interpreted as endorsing violence against civilians
It echoed historically controversial policing language
Supporters argued:
It was meant as a law-and-order warning, not a literal threat
🏛️ 3. “Lock her up” and prosecution rhetoric
Regarding political opponents like Hillary Clinton:
Trump repeatedly promoted “lock her up”
As president, he also publicly suggested investigations or prosecution of opponents
Critics say:
This can be seen as threatening use of state power against citizens/political rivals
Supporters say:
It reflects anti-corruption messaging, not literal threats
🧑⚖️ 4. Broader intimidation concerns
There are also indirect concerns:
Some lawmakers have said Trump’s rhetoric contributes to a climate where threats against politicians increase
Others argue his language pressures members of his own party politically (though that’s more about influence than direct threats)
So you can F*CK off you little MAGGOT.