Re: I guess when he had the Jerusalem cross tatooed on his chest

In Reply to: I guess when he had the Jerusalem cross tatooed on his chest posted by blindness on December 03, 2024 at 10:17:09

I'm not advocating for him. I was talking to someone (a Dem) who is going to work downstream from him so he was doing his own homework on his bio outside of partisan rhetoric.

He did believe he'd gone extreme in his rhetoric. He respected his tour. The question he had was how much was it an act for like/views and how much is he a true believer. Regardless he's stuck with him.

I'm not trying to sway anyone but give one informed military Democrat's thought process who looked beyond the news for hints into the future.

Take it for what it's worth. I'm not arguing with anyone.

Follow Ups:

• My point is (and I understand this may not be well-received) blindness 12:01:32 12/03/24 (6)
  • Apart from that he utterly unqualified for his post Dr.J 12:39:09 12/03/24 (0)
  • Re: My point is (and I understand this may not be well-received) confused442 12:34:28 12/03/24 (4)
    • My point was invading Iraq and the aftermath did not defend HasBen 15:16:42 12/03/24 (0)
    • if only that was all thay did and the only function they served* blindness 13:32:42 12/03/24 (2)
      • Respecting service doesn’t require elevating it to a magick Dr.J 14:36:20 12/03/24 (1)
        • I think a lot of soldiers in that war--including generals . . . BluBlood 13:53:18 12/04/24 (0)

Post a Followup