His rationale was a scenario in which a man would be abducted


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Open Forum ]

Posted by blindness on September 16, 2026 at 08:04:38

In Reply to: No big woof... posted by Gainsborough on September 15, 2026 at 14:53:58

trafficked, then had a gun put to his head to f*ck a goat. Or maybe he was undercover in a goat-f*ckers cartel.

I feel like those are scenarios for some serious therapy afterwards. Plus I'm sure the automatic disqualifier never meant that. There's gotta be some discretion about things done to you. Like if there's a clause that says you should never had shot heroin and you're abducted and someone injects you with heroin at gunpoint, on what planet would that be considered a disqualifier? If it is, then that's kinda f*cked up.

Pretty sure this was actually about lowering the standards the scrape the bottom if the barrel and the whole human trafficking angle was the spin they came up with.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Email:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Open Forum ]