In Reply to: The State of the Union of cfb is STRONG. The western component posted by SehornBlew on January 23, 2025 at 14:13:01
Last month you wrote this:
There is no reason to be playing more games. The number of years one can’t identify the two best teams is very very small. This year it was clear too — Oregon and Georgia.
My point is that I only care about the superior way to determine a champ. That’s the goal. The more steps you add, the less likely you get the best teams playing for all the marbles.
You'll never admit it, but you were wrong about everything. Oregon wasn't the best team (you get a pass on Georgia). I think we can all agree that it was Ohio St. You were against expanding the playoffs because it would be "less likely you get the best teams playing for all the marbles". But just the opposite happened. If the playoffs weren't expanded, Ohio St. wouldn't have been included in a four team playoff since they were ranked 6th in the final playoff rankings.
(See if you can reply without the insults.)