In Reply to: Re: exactly posted by Deplorable on July 02, 2024 at 15:26:57
much of my opinions are based upon being involved in the process of recruiting high school athletes....and the facts and reality of what is already publicly known.
You on the other hand are determined to fit things around your chosen narrative. That narrative involves not holding chip kelly accountable for his lack of recruiting prowess, while his replacements efforts in that area are making national news.
Sorry but I deal in facts and reality.
If Chip Kelly was hindered by money at UCLA, he would have left UCLA in search of another head coaching job where he wouldn't have those restraints. But he didn't do that. He went out specifically looking for jobs that where he would no longer have to run recruiting efforts as a college coach.
As I've mentioned to you previously, your argument would work a lot better if Chip Kelly hadn't tapped out all together as a head coach.
people are aligning facts with the sentiments expressed liked,
“Chip had to approve every offer,” Biggins said, “and so I think a lot of the staff members were just kind of tired or almost beaten up about, why even offer a guy, being told, ‘No, we can’t offer him right now.’ I think it kind of produced a little bit of a lazy recruiting environment where you just don’t even try anymore, you know what I mean?”
That facts on the ground back up what is being communicated about the previous regime.