The bill and contempt and injunctions


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Open Forum ]

Posted by russsmith on May 28, 2025 at 07:35:09

Not getting near enough press. People like Suskind and Cox Richardson and now J Michael Luttig are talking about it but the media isn't.

In the bill is a bit that would effectively make contempt unenforceable and any injunction where a bond wasn't posted null and void. Not going forward, retroactive, so any injunction against the Trump admin that has no bond posted, which is virtually all of them, he could immediately violate. They don't post bonds apparently because in cases against the government the resources available to the government is so huge it would be unfair to require the litigant to post a bond.

But it goes beyond just the orange menace. If you're a battered woman wanting to file a restraining order, you would now need to post a bond, even if you can't afford it.

If he gets that through there's not much else left as a response but the people rising up, the literal definition of an insurrection. Which IMO is why we're suddenly seeing people in the Supreme Court speaking up, they realize too late they gave him too much power and he's using it and he's attempting to completely nullify THEIR power to stop him

Meanwhile MAGA is posting pics of 1.99 gas online that they used AI to make because they want to support Trumps claims on prices.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Email:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Open Forum ]