Dorrell was 35-27 RN was 21-29

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Football Forum ]

Posted by Rubik543 on December 29, 2025 at 15:02:37

In Reply to: Re: Why posted by jerseybruin on December 29, 2025 at 13:51:46

Dorrell had a substantially higher winning percentage than both Chip and RN, and was only .035 behind Mora.

And yet you'd put RN ahead of Dorrell because RN was able to get way less out of better talent? That is an interesting perspective from which to evaluate a coach.

Follow Ups:

For all the knocks on Dorrell, I still appreciated the home……. hotspot 15:24:27 12/29/25 (11)
- Dorrell's first home game vs Oklahoma State Max_Wedge 17:31:12 12/29/25 (6)
  - Re: There was precedent for that.... bruincelt78 19:59:01 12/29/25 (4)
    - I had to look it up to see if that really happened TJJ 16:18:48 12/30/25 (0)
    - I'll come up with an excuse for that. hotspot 21:56:57 12/29/25 (2)
      - That must have been a really bad center TJJ 16:35:49 12/30/25 (1)
        
        The offense just felt completely different without McCloskey. hotspot 17:35:38 12/30/25 (0)
  - Re: Dorrell's first home game vs Oklahoma State Rubik543 18:46:25 12/29/25 (0)
- I love Karl Dorrell MisterJohnny 16:54:39 12/29/25 (3)
  - True Rubik543 17:00:19 12/29/25 (2)
    - I’m in agreement with you. hotspot 18:12:40 12/29/25 (1)
      - I remember Mora’s early seasons starting very strong but he had a DoctorId 02:10:23 12/30/25 (0)
Even worse, Rick’s teams regularly got blown out TJJ 15:22:22 12/29/25 (0)

Post a Followup