''We'?

In Reply to: So why do we permit it here? posted by CoastalBruin on February 16, 2026 at 12:31:26

One person owns this site. And you should know by now that he is disinclined to police it. When things go off the rails his solution isn't to sanction individuals, but usually to shut the site down for a time.

Follow Ups:

• Re: ''We'? CoastalBruin 15:18:44 02/16/26 (19)
  • Re: ''We'? confused442 10:34:44 02/17/26 (0)
  • Someone owns this site. You may not like it, but this is . . . BluBlood 17:35:41 02/16/26 (16)
    • God forbid someone suggests a change. . CoastalBruin 19:16:21 02/16/26 (15)
      • My beef is that you keep demanding the cops do something . . . BluBlood 21:27:03 02/16/26 (14)
        • Re: My beef is that you keep demanding the cops do something . . . CoastalBruin 21:34:17 02/16/26 (13)
          • Re: My beef is that you keep demanding the cops do something . . . confused442 10:48:25 02/17/26 (12)
            • That's unhinged CoastalBruin 12:35:21 02/17/26 (11)
              • Re: That's unhinged confused442 16:04:46 02/17/26 (2)
                • No but your mother does CoastalBruin 18:12:04 02/17/26 (1)
                  • Re: No but your mother does confused442 23:24:34 02/17/26 (0)
              • Re: That's unhinged Dr.J 14:02:34 02/17/26 (7)
                • I thought I was the resident pessimist? CoastalBruin 14:12:19 02/17/26 (6)
                  • It's amusing to think wood would be the only one banned BudBruin 16:12:13 02/17/26 (4)
                    • Or you even capable of thought Bud? Dr.J 20:47:31 02/17/26 (2)
                      • Or??? Or Or Or. Idiot. * BudBruin 04:09:38 02/18/26 (1)
                        • Intended as are, but you demonstrated my point Dr.J 10:16:47 02/18/26 (0)
                    • The difference, Doofy, is.... CoastalBruin 18:08:41 02/17/26 (0)
                  • Pessimist? Dr.J 15:21:14 02/17/26 (0)
  • The ideal solution would be under a better software that allows blindness 15:32:09 02/16/26 (0)

Post a Followup