Re: ''We'?

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Open Forum ]

Posted by CoastalBruin on February 16, 2026 at 15:18:44

In Reply to: ''We'? posted by BluBlood on February 16, 2026 at 15:03:00

I'm aware, of course.

That's not a better approach, as has been demonstrated for a very long time. It's well past time for a new approach.

Follow Ups:

Re: ''We'? confused442 10:34:44 02/17/26 (0)
Someone owns this site. You may not like it, but this is . . . BluBlood 17:35:41 02/16/26 (16)
- God forbid someone suggests a change. . CoastalBruin 19:16:21 02/16/26 (15)
  - My beef is that you keep demanding the cops do something . . . BluBlood 21:27:03 02/16/26 (14)
    - Re: My beef is that you keep demanding the cops do something . . . CoastalBruin 21:34:17 02/16/26 (13)
      - Re: My beef is that you keep demanding the cops do something . . . confused442 10:48:25 02/17/26 (12)
        
        That's unhinged CoastalBruin 12:35:21 02/17/26 (11)
        
        Re: That's unhinged confused442 16:04:46 02/17/26 (2)
        
        No but your mother does CoastalBruin 18:12:04 02/17/26 (1)
        
        Re: No but your mother does confused442 23:24:34 02/17/26 (0)
        
        Re: That's unhinged Dr.J 14:02:34 02/17/26 (7)
        
        I thought I was the resident pessimist? CoastalBruin 14:12:19 02/17/26 (6)
        
        It's amusing to think wood would be the only one banned BudBruin 16:12:13 02/17/26 (4)
        
        Or you even capable of thought Bud? Dr.J 20:47:31 02/17/26 (2)
        
        Or??? Or Or Or. Idiot. * BudBruin 04:09:38 02/18/26 (1)
        
        Intended as are, but you demonstrated my point Dr.J 10:16:47 02/18/26 (0)
        
        The difference, Doofy, is.... CoastalBruin 18:08:41 02/17/26 (0)
        
        Pessimist? Dr.J 15:21:14 02/17/26 (0)
The ideal solution would be under a better software that allows blindness 15:32:09 02/16/26 (0)

Post a Followup